On Thursday 01 September 2005 20:50, Reinhard Gimbel wrote: > Siegbert Baude schrieb: > > I only wanted to say that the time stamps of the Beta4 ISOs are a bit > > strange: 31.08.2004, huh? > > Why not ? Release date for beta4 is Sep. 1st. That does not necessarily > mean that the ISOs need to have that date as well. > > Or do you think these Aug. 31st files are not beta4 but some fakes ? > > I personally don't mind these few hours (or maybe days) of "unaligned" > date information. Finally the contents counts ... A few hours yes but a whole year ???
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
