On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:52:32PM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote: > Berni, I'm not saying this for you, but to some others: please think about > what "open" really is > supposed to mean in a realistic sense, given the facts above, and not squeeze > everything you'd want > the SUSE staff do for you as being the definition of "open".
I agree and sometimes it is just to know where we stand. I have no probnlem with some parts being open and some parts not for e.g. the WiKi pages. It is just that I like it to be clear. This comes perhaps from the past where Novell was not clear in e.g. the policy if getting money for a SUSE copy was clear. I got a non-conclusive answer, somebody else got an answer that you could copy, but not ask money. I do not need to get this solved at this moment. I just want to let you know where my need for clearity comes from. houghi -- Quote correct (NL) http://www.briachons.org/art/quote/ Zitiere richtig (DE) http://www.afaik.de/usenet/faq/zitieren Quote correctly (EN) http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
