On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Aschwin Marsman wrote: [...]
> The whole article can be read here: > http://www.livejournal.com/users/udrepper/8511.html > > The article looks very sane to me and I'm a bit worried about the > following: > > LSB Version 3.0 Runtime Environment Product Standard for IA32 SUSE Linux 10: > http://www.opengroup.org/lsb/cert/display_product.tpl?CALLER=cert_prodlist.tpl&_pr_id=564 > > How did SUSE Linux 10 "survive" the LSB 3.0 tests? I hope it's not just > "we did al the tests on a slow machine and then all results were > correct". I hope OpenSUSE is not only about marketing (LSB 3.0 > compliant). I guess you should read AJ's blog, who wrote an answer to Ulrichs LSB rant... ;) It can be found at http://andreasjaeger.blogspot.com/2005/09/lsb-comments.html "The tests were actually done on a new Athlon64 3000+ single processor system (running a 32-bit kernel)." Regards Christoph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
