Hello, Am Dienstag 18 Oktober 2005 10:14 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Am Montag 17 Oktober 2005 23:09 schrieb Christian Boltz: > > ... > > > > > > - max. 3 sig lines > > > > As houghi already said - 4 lines are usual. > > well 3 or 4 that doesn't really matter. But not: > fullquote of 200 lines, one line addition and 10 lines of sig.
Yes, that's the thought behind ;-) > > > - no spellcheckers > > > > Why not? Micro$oft spel chekar worgs krate, you know? ;-)) > > Did you ever try to post some piece of source code...it will look > very strange if you use a spellchecker. Good argument ;-) So let's say: no _automatic_ spellchecker. Manual use of a spellchecker is fine as long as you leave it out of source code etc. > > > And to be very correct: real names... > > > Ok, I know, I also do not use a real name. > > > > I also prefer realnames. But if people want to use a _spellable_ > > alias, it's ok for me too. > > However, I hate aliases like "fE3,x7~5X" ;-) > > Noone should use his/her password as a mail name ;-) *ROTFL* (what a luck this fits into 4 lines...) Regards, Christian Boltz -- Wer es sicher haben will, muss halt lesen. Was sollen wir tun? Die Leute zuhause besuchen, mit Broschüren in der Hand, "Guten Tag - ich möchte gern mit ihnen über Gott^W^W^W^Wihren Webserver sprechen"? [Ratti in fontlinge-devel] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
