I re-arranged the order of the quotes: Rajko M wrote: > [...] > Users logic to select plain "opensuse" list is clear to me. If one looks > for Fedora help subscribes to "fedora" not "redhat" mailing list. The > problem is that we insist on naming openSUSE for community, and SUSE > Linux for distribution. Fedora has not that problem.
I think you're right. > [...] I don't see anything wrong to leave opensuse for > the broadest range of topics, from technical to social, and create as > you proposed opensuse-project for discussion about project. > It is easier to move few of us than the whole world. > > Demand to close the list is irrational, effectively you lock the door > that most people will try to knock on. I also agree with this statement. I think we should keep this list and, if there is a requirement for a new/separate one, we should move the project-related part to the other list. This sound more feasible. The name should then be obvious ;-) But I am not sure whether we really need a separate list at this moment in time. > [...] > How to solve SUSE naming is up to Novell. Official it is SUSE Linux,on > FTP in opensuse directory is SL-10.0-OSS, than SL-10.1, than > SL-OSS-factory, and there is unofficial shortcut openSUSE (Linux). Any updates from the official side? At the end of the day, Novell must decide about the mailing lists on Novell's mail server. Cheers, Th. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
