On Thursday 22 June 2006 12:19, Oliver Tennert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 10:57 schrieb Alexander S. Usov: > > On Thursday 22 June 2006 10:04, Oliver Tennert wrote: > > > > > > In fact it seems that the problem lies somewhere in your configuration. > > Consider the following transcript which I have just obtained: > > > > ~ > sd rpm -Uvh --replacefiles --replacepkgs kaffeine-0.8.1-13.1.i586.rpm > > Preparing... ########################################### > > [100%] 1:kaffeine > > ########################################### [100%] ~ > rpm -V kaffeine > > ~ > sd rpm -Uvh kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101.i686.rpm > > warning: kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101.i686.rpm: Header V3 DSA > > signature: NOKEY, key ID 58857177 > > Preparing... ########################################### > > [100%] package kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101 is already installed > > file /opt/kde3/share/mimelnk/application/x-mplayer2.desktop from install > > of kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101 conflicts with file from package > > kdelibs3-3.5.3-25.2 > > file /opt/kde3/share/mimelnk/application/x-mplayer2.desktop from > > install of kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101 conflicts with file from > > package kaffeine-0.8.1-13.1 > > ~ > sd rpm -Uvh --replacepkgs kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101.i686.rpm > > warning: kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101.i686.rpm: Header V3 DSA > > signature: NOKEY, key ID 58857177 > > Preparing... ########################################### > > [100%] file /opt/kde3/share/mimelnk/application/x-mplayer2.desktop from > > install of kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101 conflicts with file from > > package kdelibs3-3.5.3-25.2 > > file /opt/kde3/share/mimelnk/application/x-mplayer2.desktop from > > install of kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101 conflicts with file from > > package kaffeine-0.8.1-13.1 > > ~ > sd rpm -Uvh --replacepkgs --replacefiles > > kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101.i686.rpm > > warning: kmplayer-0.9.2_2.0-1.guru.suse101.i686.rpm: Header V3 DSA > > signature: NOKEY, key ID 58857177 > > Preparing... ########################################### > > [100%] 1:kmplayer > > ########################################### [100%] ~ > rpm -V kaffeine > > S.5....T /opt/kde3/share/mimelnk/application/x-mplayer2.desktop > > ~ > lsb_release -d > > Description: SUSE LINUX 10.1 (i586) > > Did you reproduce that yourself? And: I don't quite understand the "sd" > prefix command.
Yes. The transcript above is simply the copy of xterm window, And the mysterious "sd" there is just an alias for "sudo" ;) > The example I posted was with a clean, practically virgin SUSE 10.1 > installation without anything special about it. No aliases, no adaption of > any RPM files/macros whatsover. The transcript above is also from (freshly installed) SUSE 10.1. It is not so clean anymore, but not dramatic changes dramatic. > The same happens btw on a Redhat clone (CentOS which is just a > recompilation of RHEL 4 Upd. 3), and a Fedora machine, because a) they > invented it, b) it is documented in the CHANGELOG itself. > > You missed my point: This is not a bug, but a newly introduced feature of > rpm 4.3. That's the point I am trying to make -- I don't seem to be able to observe this behavior on my desktop. If you check the transcript above you will see that rpm refuses to overwrite files unless it is given '--replacefiles' key. -- Best regards, Alexander. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
