On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 12:33:33AM +0200, Philipp Thomas wrote: > against it would have to be open sourced. But vendors don't even > follow the LGPL, or have you seen any vendor of a closed source > program/library offer the object files for relinking with a newer > version of glibc?
Most commercial applications use the shared library version of the glibc (and many other libraries) and thus don't have to ship anything. You are only violating the license if you don't ship the object code _and_ use static linking. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
pgpYBIeD89YJQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
