jdd wrote: > Thomas Hertweck a écrit : > >> AFAIK, the SuSE packages contain only the necessary patch > > but this give lots of problems when one try to use more > recent version (not suse), with frequent changes
I don't understand your comment. If any extension does not match your version of Tbird or Firefox, the program tries to find an update. If no update is available, the extension will be disabled. It the patch is missing here, then the extension won't work. So if you want to play with later versions of Firefox or TBird or whatever, it's all up to you! If you upgrade the kernel using the latest vanilla from kernel.org, you are responsible to compile for instance an NVIDIA module for the new kernel (if you want to use the NVIDIA driver) - if you don't want to do that (compile the NVIDIA kernel module), do not upgrade the kernel and use the standard SuSE kernel (which is supported and you get bugfixes for it) or don't use the extension (i.e. the NVIDIA driver). It's the same situation concerning the TBird extension, so why should it suddenly be handled in a different way? Use standard packages and it will work. Use other packages, and you're responsible for it. End of story. I really get the impression that many people here just try to run this extension down. I can't understand it. I agree that it would be better to have the reply2list extension integrated in the core TBird program. Nevertheless it's a useful extension at the moment. If you don't like it, don't use it. But don't tell other people a reply2list functionality for Tbird does not exist - this is wrong. CU, Th. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
