Carlos E. R. wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


The Thursday 2006-11-30 at 14:03 +0100, A. den Oudsten wrote:


Thanks!!
It works, but how could subfs in my fstab when I upgrade 10.0 to 10.1?


Sorry? I don't understand, there must be some word missing in that sentence.

- -- Cheers,
       Carlos E. R.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFFbyCNtTMYHG2NR9URAm18AKCISaxIg2P/vDT7Mur7+p5dfiEXzQCdFBPZ
lEy1ydsL7ndyOZn/u1VN+mQ=
=ahaB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


I was wondering how it's possible that 'subfs' could appear in the file fstab during upgrading from 10.0 to 10.1 when it does not exist in 10.1

Thanks,

Andre den Oudsten
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to