On 2006-12-19 19:45, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2006/12/19 19:18 (GMT-0600) Darryl Gregorash apparently typed: > Not "apparently" ;-) >> BTW, Felix, you created the bug as normal severity. Shouldn't it be a >> tad higher than that? I don't think it's quite a blocker, but it's >> certainly major, IMO. >> > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity > > The way I read the instructions, the assignee should determine whether > some deviation from normal is warranted for this particular bug. It's > only major if you have to reach a particular site, which would make it a > literal blocker for you. Zillions of other web sites don't produce the > problem. In the overall scheme, this is more like trivial, which > Mozilla's Bugzilla has, but not Novell's. > That isn't how I read it, particularly since my permissions allow me to edit any bug field :-)
The OP could probably bump the bug up to P0, given that it's his work site -- and for him, that is surely a major loss of function at least. -- The best way to accelerate a computer running Windows is at 9.81 m/s² -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
