Russell Jones wrote: > As for whether the OGG formats are patent-encumbered: as I said > before, by definition they are not. They just may not be backward > compatible.
They are not *known* to be patent-encumbered. It doesn't mean someone couldn't pop up with a "submarine patent" that happens to cover them. It's unlikely but it does happen. Right now it wouldn't be worthwhile, though, because no one with deep pockets is supporting Ogg. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
