On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 10:42 +0100, Verner Kjærsgaard wrote: > Onsdag 07 marts 2007 07:48 skrev Ken Jennings: > > On Friday 2006-12-01 15:52, usr wrote: > > > ... > > > > may we see the output of "df -h"? > > Here's my layout, since about the 8.0 days, now fully loaded with 10.2. /boot is ext2, all else is reiserfs.
master:~ # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 3.1G 193M 2.9G 7% / udev 506M 216K 506M 1% /dev /dev/sda1 54M 9.6M 41M 19% /boot /dev/md0 11G 6.6G 3.5G 66% /data1 /dev/sda10 39G 1.5G 38G 4% /home /dev/sdb7 132G 61G 71G 47% /local /dev/sda7 4.1G 1.4G 2.7G 34% /opt /dev/sda9 11G 74M 10G 1% /srv /dev/sda8 4.0G 9.2M 3.8G 1% /tmp /dev/md1 11G 2.3G 7.8G 23% /usr /dev/sdb2 5.1G 1.4G 3.7G 27% /usr/lib /dev/sda3 5.1G 468M 4.6G 10% /var When I do a fresh install, I copy /home into /data1 (ie /data1/home92), then format everything except /data1 and /local. (I'd hate to accidentally loose one of the kids' homework papers...or the wife's favorite recipe!) I used to keep /usr and /usr/lib on separate hard drives, to improve load speed, but now /usr is on raid, and touches both sda and sdb anyway. I can't tell a big difference. I should probably rethink that and include /local in a raid instead...next computer, I guess. Tom in NM -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
