-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2007-05-18 at 15:38 +1000, Registration Account wrote:
> This is the fundamental concept, we backup in a certain was so that if
> there is a data failure we can restore. If you need to restore a system
> to a particular date,and you use incremental backups The first part of
> the restoration is to get the backup file that we first complete as it
> contains every file. The next setup is to get hold of the incremental
> backup of the point in times the original full backup files were taken
> and when it is run it will over-right all files from base line full
> functionality to current required date.
>
> The expression "we backup so that we CAN restore" is covered more
> precisely in data security. The expression is based upon the issue if
> you are not correctly backing up you you can Never recover and hence the
> money you put into back is useless. The expression is timeless and
> covered in detail in data centre which have to be able to loose all data
> and then restore to a designated point in time.
> Scott
> :-)
Yes, I understand "we backup so that we CAN restore", but you said "back
or-order to restore", and that one I still don't understand.
In any case, a yast backup is neither full nor incremental. It is a
different type. Perhaps an "rpm differential".
- --
Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFGTWnItTMYHG2NR9URAgSGAJ91m9bkxCHEX4oAtK8VoZOc5pqcxgCfX+RD
FN7qy3bENrtsguX/cKnf7dA=
=VuNU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
