Richard Creighton wrote:
> So far
> (and until now), my belief in Linux has been vindicated and there has
> been nothing I have needed or wanted to  do that Linux hasn't been able
> to do.   I would hate to go to my grave with Windoze doing something
> that Linux cannot for simple want of a proper driver or a few magic
> incantations in some config file made by someone a lot smarter than I am
> during installation.   
You said IIRC that the install sees the individual drives.  If you have
your BIOS set to boot from one of those drives, install GRUB on that
MBR, load the fake-raid driver via the initrd, and have boot in its own
partition on that drive, That should work, and your root can be on the
raid5 fake raid.  To be honest, though, I would personally forget the
onboard raid which is a worse implementation than the linux software
raid, and I would go with linux software raid (which is what I did do). 
Windows cannot install to these fake raid either without the vendor
supplied driver (usually a floppy), and though you CAN make it work
(probably easier to install to boot on the IDE and after install move it
to the raid array), I believe performance and problems are worse than
linux software raid.

-- 
Joe Morris
Registered Linux user 231871 running openSUSE 10.2 x86_64





-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to