On Monday 15 October 2007, Daniel Feiglin wrote: > And now I can see & have solved the problem: > > In /usr/lib, I have /usr/lib/ooo-2.2 and a symlink /usr/lib/ooo-2.0 > pointing to the 2.2. It seems to want .../ooo-2.0 all the way. > > In /usr/share I found an ooo subdir and a ooo-2.0 subdir. I moved > whatever was in ooo ro ooo-2.0 and replaced it with a symlink, just in > case something needs it. > > All this mix up dates back to a long solved fonts problem with V2.1 or > 2.2, which necessitated keeping 2 versions around until it was fixed. > > Thanks for your help - and what a grind. Even with my symlinks, things > like this should just not happen.
You are welcome. Thanks for the description of the problem. I agree that it should work even with the symlinks. I have already solved some similar problems, see http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81138. Evidently, it was not enough. I am not sure if I would have time to look at the other symlink problems anytime soon. You know, there are many bugs in each software and we have to solve them by priorities. This problem affects only few users, workaround exists... I am sorry for the inconvenience. -- Best Regards, Petr Mladek software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 952 190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
