-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Saturday 2007-12-08 at 12:41 +0100, I wrote:
...
Less than half a second of error, with no network! This is indeed
surprising.
It seems that my computer works better with the 'tsc' clocksource than
with the 'acpi_pm' one. Now the problem is to know why 'tsc' was rejected
on boot or later.
Because of this:
<4>Marking TSC unstable due to: possible TSC halt in C2.
What is C2?
Dec 8 13:51:36 nimrodel kernel: Time: tsc clocksource has been installed.
Dec 8 13:56:52 nimrodel kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 32800377181
ns)
Nevertheless, the system clock using TSC is stable, and when it uses
acpi_pm id delays entire minutes.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHWsZ4tTMYHG2NR9URArZTAJ9L2gLOo9Q3S81d93gHaaFzpbou+QCfVfIT
VI9wEP88+Ou501PfrIlIgMw=
=XjHJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
