I find it interesting that there were more responses on the topic of email threading than there were for the original question.
I'll bet we get about 4 more posts because I top-posted. Can't we cut each other some slack? On Saturday 19 January 2008 10:10:32 am Carlos E. R. wrote: > The Saturday 2008-01-19 at 08:48 -0800, PerfectReign wrote: > > On Sat, January 19, 2008 7:11 am, Philipp Thomas wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:18:51 -0800 (PST), PerfectReign wrote: > >>> This is email. There is no thread. > >> > >> Either you simply forgot a smiley or I don't get it. Of cause there > >> are > >> mail threads. What do you think In-Reply-To and References in the mail > >> header were invented for? > >> > >> Yes, there are those wannabe MUAs such as Outlook, Groupwise and Notes > >> that constantly ignore the existence of In-Reply-To, but that's a > >> different story. > > > > My apologies. I forgot that you can thread emails on KMail. > > All decent mail programs do thread. Thunderbird, Mozilla, Kmail, even text > only clients like Pine or mutt. Gmail web client does thread, but it calls > it "conversations". > > And the archive is threaded. > > Even Outlook does thread: > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 > Thread-Index: AchZxUFbeX4hpExoQh2zru0l/TqnbgAAC2AA > > Although being Microsoft, it uses something else instead of the standard. > > > > -- > Cheers, > Carlos E. R. -- Mike Diehl ------------------------------------------------------- -- Mike Diehl -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
