Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 13:28 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> Are you sure it is the SMP kernel and not the bigsmp one? There's no >> explicit SMP one anymore. > > The system is used in a road measurement vehicle, so they are not always > handy. I got the info over the phone. When the user said "big SMP", I > thought big meant the case of the letters. One hears what one wants to > hear. > > The system has 4GB of RAM. I guess that is why it uses the -BIGSMP > kernel?
Correct. > The reason this came up was that I stopped worrying about supplying an > -SMP version of a local device driver in our packages. Life was getting > simple: only the -default kernel was needed. That didn't last so long. > Now I need to dig up a system sunning a -BIGSMP kernel to compile the > driver for the package. That's the hard part. We removed the SMP but BIGSMP is still needed and was needed in this case before already on 32-bit x86 systems, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
pgpG8akVt01Gg.pgp
Description: PGP signature