What are the current thoughts on moving to one form of configuration (i.e. getting rid of views.properties and just using actions.xml)?
-----Original Message----- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:plightbo@;cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 12:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork Security Requirements Oh, good! I just thought two different ServletDispatchers would be nice to offer flexibility, but maybe only one is needed. Either way, doing it this way is nice also because internal actions are now not exposed at all. One of these days we might want to rename views.properties, since it's not views at all anyone, but action definitions. In fact, I'd be all for requiring an action to be aliased before it can be used (not more looking in the package). I alias all my actions before using them. This sorta goes back to my original hope that configuration be simplified and make much more sense in version 2.0. -Pat ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
