Yes, agree but I'm trying to say is that a bug ( not thread safe code ? ) that
is suppose to be fix ?

Regards,
Low
--- Rickard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heng Sin Low wrote:
> 
> > I remember seeing in a previous post in the list that PropertyEditor is
> being
> > cache inappropriately in BeanUtil ( not thread safe, I think ). I don't see
> > anything related to that in the 1.3 changelog or do I miss something here (
> Not
> > an issue after all, may be ) ?
> 
> 
> Caching PropertyEditor's is not the solution. The solution is to not use 
> PropertyEditors at all. They weren't designed for what we use them for, 
> and the API is just terrible.
> 
> /Rickard
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Order your Holiday Geek Presents Now!
> Green Lasers, Hip Geek T-Shirts, Remote Control Tanks, Caffeinated Soap,
> MP3 Players,  XBox Games,  Flying Saucers,  WebCams,  Smart Putty.
> T H I N K G E E K . C O M       http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Order your Holiday Geek Presents Now!
Green Lasers, Hip Geek T-Shirts, Remote Control Tanks, Caffeinated Soap,
MP3 Players,  XBox Games,  Flying Saucers,  WebCams,  Smart Putty.
T H I N K G E E K . C O M       http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to