As I recall, Rickard asked the list if anyone was using it; nobody replied
positively, so the need for a migration was assumed to be light.
Assumptions, as usual... erm... let's go into avoid-stupid-aphorisms mode.
This goes back to scope and myopia.

That aside, how SHOULD Paolo's problem be solved?

On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, boxed wrote:

> I suppose no one bothered to include some kind of migration path for this
> "bugfix" like I said was needed?
>
> Anders Hovmöller
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://boxed.killingar.net
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vedovato Paolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Webwork (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:41
> Subject: [OS-webwork] URLTag changes in ww 1.3
>
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > we use the webtable ww tag in our application. After installing 1.3.0 rc1
> > the sorting in our tables in our application doesn't behave correctly
> > anymore.
> >
> > After some investigating I saw that the URLTag in the way that POST'ed
> data
> > isn't included anymore when the url tag has no value parameter - cvs
> > comment: "Generated tag no longer includes parameters that were POST'ed if
> > the "page" attribute is not specified"
> >
> > Unfortunatly the table.jsp which is used for the webtable tag does use the
> > url tag in that manner to set up the sorting link.
> > [..]
> >  <a href="<webwork:url><webwork:param name="sortColumnLinkName"
> > value="offset"/>
> > <webwork:param name="sortOrderLinkName"
> > value="'ASC'"/></webwork:url>">
> >   <img src="images/unsorted_asc.gif" border="0" align="bottom"/></a>
> > [..]
> >
> > now our POSTed data in our forms isn't used anymore when sorting and so
> > nearly all views with forms and tables don't work properly anymore.
> >
> > What's the best way to get our tables working as before? Another thought:
> > couldn't be added a parameter to the URLTag that could decide if the
> POSTed
> > parameters are included or not (so the distinction if the parameters are
> > added or not is not driven by the value attribute...)
> >
> > Many thanks for your help.
> >
> > Cheers
> > -Paolo
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> > http://www.vasoftware.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>

---------------------------------------------------------
Joseph B. Ottinger                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://enigmastation.com                    IT Consultant



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to