Quoting Rickard �berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hani Suleiman wrote: > > Well, we're not talking about writing a tx system here, just providing > the calls to begin/commit/rollback. And that's definitely a good idea to > put here, especially if you're doing a straight servlets/db application, > i.e. no EJB's to do the tx demarcation. And even if you *do* use EJB, > sometimes it's better to do tx demarcation at this level instead of > introducing a new session bean just to be able to do tx mgmt for a set > of operations. > Sure, however, please do keep in mind that many people do choose to use EJB's for the tx stuff. Session beans really are great for that kind of thing. I realise that you and others have much against EJBs, and that's fair enough, but I was just voicing the sentiment that I don't want xwork to become a framework that aims to replace EJBs.
Hani ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
