> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Hidden token > > > I think the only reason Struts needs the ui:form is to associate the > form to the form bean. > > I'm against the idea of a ui:form tag. ie. mandatory use of > WW UI tags > for proper behaviour. > > Struts form beans don't work unless you use their UI tags. > >>
I was proposing the ww:form tag only to do this (the hidden token) for you. I believe Rickard's proposed method will also require this (or would you do <form action="<ww:url .../>">?) I suppose we could also have the token creation be in a util action that would populate the session, and you could call it from the jsp using ww:action as well. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
