I'm going to say +0 on the two jars and -0 on more complex alternatives. On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Erik Beeson wrote:
> Jason says 7 jars, Hani says 1, Pat says 2. I have two things to say. > > First, should webwork-2.0.jar include the code in xwork-1.0.jar, or should > it depend on it? One way makes webwork-2.0.jar stand alone, the other > keeps the webwork (not xwork) specific code abstracted from xwork code. > > Second, maybe there should be one separate jar for the view code? > > Third, all of this should be configurable via build.properties, so one > could have a single webwork-2.0.jar with everything included, or one could > have more smaller jars as Jason suggested. > > I guess the real question is what should the default be? Maybe 2 files, > like Pat said, and have the web tied view code in webwork.jar and the non > web view code in xwork.jar? > > Ok, so 3 things to say. > > --Erik > > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Patrick Lightbody wrote: > > > I think that two jars is a good middle ground: > > > > xwork-1.0.jar > > webwork-2.0.jar > > > > This is what we've been planning on all along. > > > > -Pat > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Hani Suleiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:26 PM > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Partition XWork [Was: Re: XWork flux] > > > > > > > -1 from me, I like that it's one nice webwork.jar to plop in. Having to > > > pay another 30k for velocity support (or whatever else I don't use > > > currently) isn't such a big deal. It's too jakartaish to have your > > > product be 50 jars. > > > > > > On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 01:15 PM, Rickard �berg wrote: > > > > > > > Jason Carreira wrote: > > > >> So the real question here is whether it makes sense to partition > > > >> Webwork 2.0 into: > > > >> Webwork-core > > > >> Webwork-el > > > >> Webwork-jsp > > > >> Webwork-velocity > > > >> Webwork-xslt > > > >> Webwork-jasperreports > > > >> Webwork-freemarket > > > >> There may be later extensions to Xwork as well (JMSWork?, MailWork?). > > > >> Personally, I think Webwork is small enough to stand as one module > > > >> with all of the view types included. > > > > > > > > Yup. I have no issue with adding build targets that build the above > > > > specific stuff, but separating it into separate CVS modules just > > > > brings more headache than it's worth. > > > > > > > > /Rickard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > > > > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > > > > http://www.vasoftware.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > > > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld > > http://www.vasoftware.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld http://www.vasoftware.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
