I can tell you MY grievance.. people keep saying "drop it, it's dropped" and then we keep seeing it go on and on and on and on. Who are you, the Energizer Bunny?
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Jonathan Revusky wrote: > Hani Suleiman wrote: > > > Alright. EVERYONE JUST IGNORE HIM. > > Right. They should follow the fine example you are setting. <LOL> > > > That way he gets to have the last > > word and will go away. I realise of course that he'll need to respond > > to this message, > > I read your message in the archive and, yes, I am responding because I > have a simple request to make of you, Hani. > > Could you please summarize what specific grievance you have against me? > I mean, if I were a completely uninvolved observer to this and observed > this level of seething hostility that you've been expressing towards > me, I would really wonder what was behind it. As things stand, I am not > an uninvolved observer and I am wondering about it nonetheless. > > I mean, you keep up with this insulting, baiting behavior and it is > just incomprehensible. I have wracked my memory and I have no > recollection of any prior interaction with you. I do not believe that > you and I are acquainted. > > But my memory is imperfect. So, if I have wronged you in some fashion, > if you have some actual grievance against me, could you please just > forthrightly state it? (*) > > Thanks, > > Jonathan Revusky > > (*) It should be obvious that Hani is the only person who can respond > to this. So, anybody thinking about starting a "Greek chorus" or > whatever really ought to refrain. This *is* embarrassing and off-topic > and should end right here. I'm sorry about adding one more post to > this, and it' s probably a bit self-indulgent on my part. But I didn't > start the topic, this has been quite disturbing to me, and I feel like > the question I'm asking Hani needed to be asked... just for the sake of > closure and clarity. > > > but after that, everyone resist the urge so we can > > bury this more embarassing than usual thread. > > On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 01:52 PM, Jonathan Revusky wrote: > > > Jason Carreira wrote: > > > > >> I'm not asking that you love me or anything but keep it to > > yourself. > > >> If you feel the temptation to say negative personal things > > >> about me or > > >> anybody else connected with FM, I hope you will have the > > >> sense to bite > > >> your tongue or sit on your hands or whatever is necessary. And > > we'll > > >> all be better off. That's a win-win proposition. > > > > > > > Good. I see that the part of my message that you quoted is indeed the > > truly relevant part. So I take it we have a deal. > > > > >And I hope you'll do the same and stop this thread now. > > > > Well, of course, I'm going to do the same, Jason. I'm not going to > > badmouth anybody from the WW camp on a FreeMarker list. I never have > > and it would never occur to me. I guess I just figured that part went > > without saying. > > > > As for stopping the thread, I think that a reading of my last message > > will show that the message was deliberately crafted to stop the > thread > > cold. That was my intention. (I can only speculate about some other > > people's agendas... Look at some of these other messages where people > > are trying to fan the flames....) > > > > >This is a > > > mailing list to discuss the development of an opensource project, > and > > >that is what we, the subscribers of this list, would like to get > back > > >to. > > > > Well, yeah, absolutely. That is why it was wrong to bring up this > > off-topic personality stuff. But, for the nth time, I didn't bring up > > this topic. > > > > As I said before, I am actively encouraging the WW-FM integration > > work. It's a win-win overall, but you guys will really get quite a > bit > > of value-added. So all of this other gratuitous nonsense does leave a > > bad taste in my mouth. > > > > So okay, we have deal? You guys don't badmouth anybody from the FM > > camp on a WW list. And we behave accordingly. BTW, I am not currently > > subscribed to this list. When I stated that I was unsubscribing, I > > really did unsubscribe. I became aware of your response here by > > looking at the archive. (I actually resolved not to... but okay... > I'm > > human... :-)) > > > > Regards, > > > > Jonathan Revusky > > -- > > FreeMarker 2.2pre2 is out! http://freemarker.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > > http://www.vasoftware.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
