On the table is the ThreadLocal issue and how to re-introduce it. The
current Xwork code uses an ActionInvocation which is passed to each of
the interceptors and holds the state of the request processing. In order
to make Actions (more) backward compatible in WW 2.0, we need to
re-introduce the ThreadLocal state management concept from WW 1.2/1.3. 

Rickard, etc. let me know if this is a good time for you. Anyone who
plans to attend, please look through the sandbox code first. If you have
any other issues you'd like to discuss, please post them to this list so
people have time to think about them beforehand.

Patrick has suggested we do this on #xwork on irc.werken.com, so that it
can be logged at http://irc.werken.com/channels/.

Jason

--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone:  585.240.2793
  fax:  585.272.8118
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm)
 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to