It's only a thought but can't the syntax be changed so that any run time overhead by looking something up from the stack can be avoided based on syntax of the string? I mean ... by all means add the support in WebWorkTagSupport to look all things up on the stack but allow the user to choose when it makes sense
to follow that path or not.

On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 01:49 AM, Erik Beeson wrote:

I'm talking about webwork 2.0. Should everything be lookedup on the stack?
Pat's TextfieldTag currently doesn't. I just want some clear standard to
be decided upon.

--Erik

On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Scott Farquhar wrote:

Erik,

Which values are not looked up on the stack? I know that "id" isn't (in
iterator tag). Anything else?

I don't think that this can be fixed in current webwork, as we would not
be able to maintain backwards compatibility? You should add this as a
feature to webwork 2.0.

Cheers,
Scott

Erik Beeson wrote:
The biggest complaint that I hear about the ww taglib is the when to and
when not to enclose params in single quotes. Currently, the best method
for figuring this out seems to be to check the source to see if the param
is ever looked up on the stack. Could there be some standard agreement
made as to what is and what isn't looked up on the stack? Thoughts?

--Erik



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

--

ATLASSIAN - http://www.atlassian.com
Expert J2EE Software, Services and Support
-------------------------------------------------------
Need a simple, powerful way to track and manage issues?
Try JIRA - http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to