I added this under the WebWork cookbook. BTW can we take a vote or something on releasing 1.3 officially? I've been doing development with 1.2 for about a month now and there are a number of incompatibilities when switching to 1.3. Nothing major but annoying nevertheless. It is a little scary to depend on code being stable when the codebase is a moving target.
After releasing 1.3 how about creating a 1.3 branch in CVS to support bug fixes and minor enhancements like we discussed previously? 1.4 can then continue on the head. -----Original Message----- From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 2/4/2003 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Graphical submit buttons and WW 1.2.1 Good question. I don't have an answer, but whoever figures this out, please Wiki it too. :-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Kirk Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:50 PM > To: webwork list > Subject: [OS-webwork] Graphical submit buttons and WW 1.2.1 > > > Hi All, > > I was wondering if someone has tried using multiple graphical > submit buttons on a single form? > > For example let's say I have the following: > > <form> > <ui:textfield label="'Email'" name="'userID'" > maxlength="100"/> <ui:password label="'Password'" > name="'password'" maxlength="32"/> > > <input type="image" src="/img/sign_on.gif" name="doSignIn" > value="Sign In" /> <input type="image" src="/img/update.gif" > name="doUpdate" value="Update Settings" /> </form> > > If I had regular submit buttons (i.e. type=submit), the > dispatcher would call "setDoSignIn()" and "setDoUpdate()) > because the parameter name would simply be "doSignIn" and > "doUpdate" respectively. > > But in the case of graphical submit buttons the parameters > sent from the browser become "doSignIn.x" and "doSignIn.y" > and "doUpdate.x" and "doUpdate.y". Other than making my > action ServletRequestAware and using the servlet request > directly to look at the parameter is there a best practices > for dealing with this issue? > > Thanks, > Kirk Rasmussen > Lucasfilm Ltd. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =omething 2 > See! http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
