Title: Message

Well, it was just a little idea for clearer API, imho.

There is no difference in functionality, just naming =)

I guess its not really worthwhile though.

 

Regards,

-Andre Mermegas

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Carreira
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] ActionForward or some sort of forward type thing

 

Why? What's the difference here?

-----Original Message-----
From: Andre Mermegas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] ActionForward or some sort of forward type thing

Hey all, I’m curious if perhaps in ww2 there could be some sort forward type idea.

I’ll illustrate a little. Right now as I understand it, if I have a view, that I don’t have any particular logic or model to associate with it at the moment, but I want it go through the WebWork framework instead of just accessing the .jsp page I have to do something like this:

 

test.action="">

test.success=somepage.jsp

 

which could be clearer if it were like this

othertest.action="">

othertest.success=someotherpage.jsp

 

I think it might be useful if there was a utility class in webwork.action called ActionForward or something similar that just extended ActionSupport

What do you think?

 

Regards,

-Andre Mermegas

 

Reply via email to