>>> Which brings up a question about WW. I have the ability to >>> execute one of many commands as described above, so should I >>> be able to give each its own treatment in the mapping file? >>> >>> ex: >>> foo.action!save.success=someview.vm >>> foo.action!cancel.success=index.action >>> >>> -Steve >>> > >> >> You can do this already. >> >> Jason
I'm looking at GenericDispatcher and it seems clear that the view is determined by the original actionName + action result. There would have to be something that transformed the actionName into actionName + "!" + commandName to do what I was suggesting, somewhere along the way. I'm not suggesting it as a feature at this point, but does what I'm suggesting seem logical/necessary to anyone else? -Steve ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
