> I would please like to know from you guys out there, > if anyone has used struts then moved over to using > webwork.
I have. I first used Struts in it's beta and first 1.0 release. Then moved to WebWork and then to Maverick. They all are basically the same. WebWork is a little bit more straight forward, simpler and cleaner (to use and learn) than Struts. And then again I see Maverick as a little bit cleaner and simpler than WebWork. > I would like to know if it is a feasible option, > and what the pro's and con's of each are. There are not that many differences (just do your work, none of these frameworks can do it for you). > I have read the FAQ on the comparison between struts > and webwork, but i would like to hear from developers > who have actually used webwork and struts. Which seems > to be the better option? WebWork 2.0 seems interesting, but it is too early to say what comes out. Maverick has been there very long and it reached it's goal about a year ago (no major development efforts for maverick, so it's quite stable). These all frameworks seem to be just an implementation of the very old concept of Command Pattern. Just test them all but do not spend too much time on selecting the framework. Regards Aapo ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
