May be you can share the source and the porting experience on the WIKI ? thanks. --- Thomas Escobar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bernard and I had a similar weekend - I'm porting a WW > 1.0 app to WW/Xwork (for fun, not production), ran > into the same null pointer and resolved it the same > way (root components in otherwise empty > components.xml). I'll pull my ServletContextListener > as the real solution. Thanks! > > However, the reason I had added the > ServletContextListener was as a (shot-in-the-dark) > attempt to resolve another null pointer I was getting: > > > ActionContext.getSession() always returns a null Map. > > I've replaced this with: > > ServletActionContext.getRequest().getSession() > > ...and all is fine, but I'm wondering if I haven't > misconfigured something (although walking through the > code, there's nothing in WW 2.0 that seems to set the > session). ActionContext.getSession() was useful in WW > 1.0 for returning a convenient wrapper around the > HttpSession (SessionMap) - is this not going to be the > case anymore? Will there be a return of SessionAware > eventually? > > The other issue I ran into was the absence of many of > the WW 1.0 JSP tags - url, action and bean in > particular. The roadmap makes no mention of these and > I couldn't find details in the archives so I'll just > ask: what are the status of these tags - deprecated, > not yet implemented, terminated? > > I'm not particularly distraught as there are clear > techniques to switch to and (largely because of the > testimonials I've been reading in this list) I'm going > to try out Velocity but I am still curious about the > absence of the tags. > > Otherwise the port has been as smooth as can be. The > interceptors and validation scheme have been > excellent. Great work! > > t > > _____________________________________________ > > You should only need this ServletContextListener if > you are using the > Component stuff, in which case you would also need a > components.xml > file > to describe the components you use.=20 > > > > I get around it by providing a dummy components.xml > file=20 > > where it only=20 > > has a root node with nothing in between. It works > that way. > >=20 > >=20 > > cheers, > > /bernard > >=20 > >=20 > > Jason > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online > http://webhosting.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! > Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and > the chance of winning an Apple iPod: > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
