The Discussion is regarding ur explaination about the Webwork Model Component.
Model Component
If webwork was replaced by some other framework chances of the Action
class will be replaced by some thing else
therefore it isn't a part of the model domain but tightly coupled to the
WebWork controller, Another reason to consider
the webwork Action class part of the controller is that it has access to
the ServletDispatcher and therefore all of the
controller resources which the model domain should not know about, so
Action class is part of the controller.

My Explanation about WebWork Model is:
Depending of the type of architecture ur application uses, the model portion can take many different forms.
In a two tier application,where the web tier interacts diectly with a data store,the model classes may be a set of java classes.
Where as in the case of complex enterprise application(Where web tier communicates with Ejb Server),the model portion will be a enterprise java bean.
Joseph Ottinger wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Snehal K.Gandhi wrote:

  
thnx, that's a clean explanation of the MVC on webwork, but i would like
to share the model part of it
as i read it in a boook.
    

I don't understand what your response means. You would like to share....
the model part of it? I can't see any difficulty in that; it's a set of
Actions, the valuestack introspects the set until it finds a value that
matches a given name (actually, an expression that can go down attribute
chains to find a value) to get values out of the model. But what does "as
I read it in a book" mean?

  
Joseph Ottinger wrote:

    
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Hariharan wrote:



      
Hi
   I would like to know in-depth about the Framework of Webwork.Pls
explain about the
Webwork Model Components.


        
As I understand it, WebWork "model" components are actually composites,
build through a stack, called the "ValueStack." Models are implementations
of "Action," often extensions of "ActionSupport," and follow ordinary
JavaBean semantics.


      
if webwork was replaced by some other framework chances of the Action
class will be replaced by some thing else
therefore it isn't a part of the model domain but tightly coupled to the
WebWork controller, Another reason to consider
the webwork Action class part of the controller is that it has access to
the ServletDispatcher and therefore all of the
controller resources which the model domain should not know about, so
Action class is part of the controller.

    
      
Webwork View Components.


        
One of WebWork's strengths is that view components are entirely up to the
user. If you'd like to use JSP, that's fine. If you'd like to use
Velocity, that's all right as well. If you'd like to use GUI components,
that's easily accomplished. If you'd like to use a servlet (why?), I
imagine that'd not be difficult either.



      
Webwork Controller Components.


        
WebWork uses a dispatcher as a Controller. I haven't done much with this,
as it's a fairly workable black box; servlets are provided to give you
easy access and use of a controller (for JSP and Velocity - the Velocity
servlet doing a touch more work to store the valuestack components into
the velocity context), and non-web dispatchers are easy to work with as
well, I'd imagine.



      
with regards
Hariharan.P

--
P.Hariharan
Sip Technologies & Exports Ltd.,
G4 Elnet Software City, Taramani Chennai -113
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]         Phone 22541473/74 Ext 314




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



        
---------------------------------------------------------
Joseph B. Ottinger                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://enigmastation.com                    IT Consultant



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



      
    

---------------------------------------------------------
Joseph B. Ottinger                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://enigmastation.com                    IT Consultant



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

  

-- 
Snehal K. Gandhi	SIP Technologies & Exports Ltd.,
Software Engineer	G4 Elnet SoftwareCity, Chennai
Core Technology Group	URL:http://www.siptech.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]	Ph: +91-44-22541473/4 x313
-- 

Reply via email to