Well, it's generally useful for anything that wants to have independent
sub-pages with their own parameter namespace (which is pretty much what
a portlet is). Unless and until we have someone familiar with and
experienced in Portlet development *cough*Rickard*cough* who wants to do
this, especially since the Portlet standard is not even out where the
public can see it, I think we should leave it on the drawing board.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 10:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Namespace for parameter
> 
> 
> My opinion on this is that it is a very unique type of 
> dispatcher (specifically used for portlets I guess). Instead 
> of trying to force it in to the basic ServletDispatcher, we 
> should make a new kind of dispatcher if we want to include 
> this in WebWork 2.0.
> 
> -Pat
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Heng Sin Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "OS-Webwork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:15 AM
> Subject: [OS-webwork] Namespace for parameter
> 
> 
> > Would the following be implemented ? ( Couldn't found any entry on 
> > jira )
> >
> > Takan directly from WIKI:
> >
> > When rendering URL's, the parameters need to be namespace'd 
> in order 
> > to
> allow
> > several portlets to happily live together on a page. I.e. instead of
> having
> > ?foo=bar one could have ?1.foo=bar&2.foo=bar. The XWork servlet 
> > dispatcher would then at execution filter out those 
> parameters which 
> > does not apply
> to the
> > action/component/portlet being executed, and only the remaining 
> > parameters
> are
> > applied using the setX() initialization code. This requires the 
> > rendering
> code
> > to use either a taglib (in JSP) or some JavaBean (in 
> Velocity) which 
> > can
> do
> > this encoding. I know that for *some* applications this will be 
> > overkill,
> but
> > for those of use who are going beyond very simple web apps it is a
> definitive
> > must.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Low
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on 
> your desktop! 
> > http://platinum.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
> > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
> > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
> No other company gives more support or power for your 
> dedicated server 
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020> aff/direct/01/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to