PropertySet is for generic mappings... the XMLPropertySet would not be
pretty to work with, I don't think this is a good idea.

-Pat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Heng Sin Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OS-Webwork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:06 PM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork2 configuration and PropertySet


> Hi,
>
> Does it make sense to replace ww2's current configuration framework with
> propertyset ? The aggregated propertyset seems to be a perfect replacement
for
> ww2's delegation base configuration framework.
>
> Regards,
> Low
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> http://search.yahoo.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
> relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to