PropertySet is for generic mappings... the XMLPropertySet would not be pretty to work with, I don't think this is a good idea.
-Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Heng Sin Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OS-Webwork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:06 PM Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork2 configuration and PropertySet > Hi, > > Does it make sense to replace ww2's current configuration framework with > propertyset ? The aggregated propertyset seems to be a perfect replacement for > ww2's delegation base configuration framework. > > Regards, > Low > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. > Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
