If you guys see any differences between 1.x and 2.0, please open jira issues
so we can make sure migration as painless as possible. I just added
IncludeTag and a couple other things from 1.3 today, so keep 'em coming!
-Pat
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:14 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Loop to create days
> I am using ww2 so there is no webwork.util.counter class. I don't know
how
> it worked in ww1 but in ww2 the Iterator tag will only use a Collection,
> Array, or a Map. But you have shown the kind of thing I would like to be
> able to do.
>
> John.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> Anders wrote:
>
> What you want to do (I think) is:
>
> <ww:bean name="'webwork.util.Counter'" id="'days'">
> <ww:param name="'first'" value="'1'"/>
> <WW:param name="'last'" value="'31'"/>
> <ww:iterator>
> <option value="<ww:property/>" <ww:if test=". ==
> ../../yourActionAttribute">selected</ww:if>><ww:property/></option>
> </ww:iterator>
> </ww:bean>
>
> The above is untested, though.
>
> //Anders
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:33:16AM +0100, John Patterson wrote:
> > I agree that the code you supplied is not the best (or least complex)
way
> to
> > solve this. Using scriptlets is what I want to avoid (but what I also
> > resorted to). However, the code that you gave does not solve the
problem.
> > I need to compare the "loop variable with a property on my action".
> >
> > Creating a collection to hold the numbers 1 to 31 is also a round about
> way
> > to achieve something very simple.
> >
> > I am not using the select control because, as far as I can tell, it does
> not
> > allow you to use it in forms that are not laid out in the simple single
> > column design (is this correct?). The control header creates a new row
in
> a
> > table (supplied by the <ww:form> element) with two <td>'s. My design
> > requires a more complex form layout. It requires that two controls
appear
> > in the same row adjacent to each other. Or is there a way to get the
> Select
> > tag to work in these situations?
> >
> > What would be handy here is functionality similar to the JSTL iterator
tag
> > that allows you to also specify a start value and an end value. Maybe
it
> > could put the index value on the stack so that you can easily use it in
> > comparisons with properties on the Action.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Francisco Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 3:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Loop to create days
> >
> >
> > > is there a reason you can just use webworks select tags?
> > >
> > >
> > > Bernard Choi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well... the following meets your condition for not using collections
> or
> > > > arrays...
> > > >
> > > > <% for (int day = 1; day <= 31; day++) { %>
> > > > <option <%if (day = selectedDay)
{%>selected<%}%>><%=day%></option>
> > > > <% } %>
> > > >
> > > > Not using collections or arrays => more visually complex.
> > > > Does "object creation" has that large an impact on the server to
> warrant
> > > > complex-looking codes ?
> > > >
> > > > I feel that the above is visually more complex, and more difficult
to
> > > > read, even if it does not use collections or arrays. Why is there
the
> > > > contraint for "excessive object creation" on the server ? Why does
it
> > > > "seem wrong" ? There is object creation, but I don't think they are
> > > > "excessive" as they function to help make readable code.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > *From:* John Patterson <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > *Sent:* Friday, September 12, 2003 4:39 AM
> > > > *Subject:* Re: [OS-webwork] Loop to create days
> > > >
> > > > I am using jsp for the view. I would not want to use a
collection
> > > > or array for a simple "for" construct due to added complexity
and
> > > > excessive object creation. It just seems wrong. I need to set
> one
> > > > of the values "selected"...
> > > >
> > > > <option value="22" selected>22</option>
> > > >
> > > > ...by comparing the loop variable with a property on my action.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >
> > > > *From:* Bernard Choi <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:30 PM
> > > > *Subject:* Re: [OS-webwork] Loop to create days
> > > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > Is the following acceptable ?
> > > >
> > > > #foreach( $day in [1..31] )
> > > > <option value="$day">$day</option>
> > > > #end
> > > >
> > > > What is your concern with using collections or arrays ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > *From:* John Patterson
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > *To:* Webwork
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > *Sent:* Friday, September 12, 2003 12:16 AM
> > > > *Subject:* [OS-webwork] Loop to create days
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to create a list of day options for a
select
> > > > like so:
> > > >
> > > > <option value="1">1</option>
> > > > <option value="2">2</option>
> > > > ...
> > > > <option value="31">31</option>
> > > >
> > > > Can I do this without using a collection or array of
> numbers
> > > > and iterating through them?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > John.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
>
> --
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> . Anders Engström [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> . http://www.gnejs.net PGP-Key: ED010E7F
> . [Your mind is like an umbrella. It doesn't work unless you open it.]
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
