> -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew E. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 2:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] hibernate/webwork2 best practices > > > I have looked at Spring and even had a chance to write some > code using > it. However, I am not yet at a decision on it. > > As previously mentioned, there is some work to do in order to plug in > Spring's IoC. We would lose some of the beauty of Actions > having their > components set without XML metadata. Also, for those people > using the > Hibernate Open Session in View pattern. See the mailing list > discussion on why Spring is really suited for this and why > that may be > a good thing - > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=5769262 . > > > Cheers, > matthew > >
Was that supposed to say "NOT really suited for this"? I feel the same way... I haven't come to a decision... I really want to like Picocontainer... I'm not there yet... The constructor thing bothers me. I've been emailing with Rod Johnson from Spring, and he said he's working on something for the BeanFactory that might help with having to specify XML descriptors for end-users of the components (Actions).... I was explaining how the enabler interfaces replace the XML in this case. I'm not sure. There's a lot up in the air around this area right now. Jason ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
