I'm not sure what you mean, but I've unlocked the file, so go for it...
What I meant seemed to me perfectly obvious: you've barred me (and I assume pretty much everyone else) from contributing on this perticular document. What, may I ask, is the point of having a wiki for documentation if you lock documents?
Also I take some offense to the fact that someone has written "not too painful" as a description of how migration is done. This is pretty weird since no migration of any live application has ever been done and reported. Migration IS "too painful", and it will be until people start taking it seriously. "We'll fix it later" or "just after these bugs" shows clearly a shift in priorities from helping users of WW1 (as was one of the original specifications for WW2 in the first place) to a WW2-oriented approach that basically seems to say that migration is to be a slow and horrid thing of going through all the code. This is much like a migration from struts to ww2 would be, it's just not helping users.
A glaring example of this is the absense of the JSP migration tool that was one of the only reasons many people even considered OGNL.
Anders Hovmöller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
