Yes... Any runtime exception can be thrown... > -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Spam:RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > In this case, you have to throw an exception for a > user-defined converter? > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : lundi 29 septembre 2003 > 20:32 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > I'm working on the type conversion code to add field errors. > They will be keyed like this: > > invalid.fieldvalue.xxx > > Where xxx is your field name. It will also have a default > message which will be shown if the above key could not be > found in the Action's resource bundle. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 2:20 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > > > > Ok, you say "Type conversion handle this". But when will be > > planned that the user-defined converters add a field error > > (maybe with a specific Exception thrown as you said) ? > > Cheers. Richard. > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : samedi 27 septembre 2003 > > 14:19 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > > > > You thought what I said was overcomplicated? This sounds WAY > > too complicated... Type conversion handles this... > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:53 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > > > > > > > In fact, this way of thinking is overcomplicated. Why cant we add > > > another level of validation. > > > > > > Level 1 before ParamsInterceptor : > > > I validate the representation types of input parameters > > > (ActionContext.getContext().getParameters()) > > > For instance, a string represents really a date. > > > > > > Level 2 after ParamsInterceptor : > > > I validate the bean data. > > > For instance, date1 is not null, date1>date2, ... > > > > > > Any remarks ? > > > Cheers. > > > Richard. > > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : vendredi 26 septembre > > 2003 16:54 A > > > : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > My question : how can i do to see the message "Your text > > "Foo Bar" > > > > could not be parsed as a date", what can i do in my > > > dateconverter to > > > > add a FieldError ???? > > > > > > > > Cheers. > > > > Richard. > > > > > > Short answer: You can't > > > Long answer: You can't, yet... > > > > > > I'm trying to figure out if it's ok for you if we figure > out how to > > > make the converter add a field error, but then the > > > RequiredFieldValidator is also going to add a message. > > > > > > I think we can do this with a custom runtime error... > > > > > > throw new XworkTypeConversionMessageException("Your text '" > > + value + > > > "' could not be parsed as a date"); > > > > > > The type conversion framework can be made to catch this > > exception type > > > and add the message from it to the field errors. > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
