WHERE DOES THE MADNESS END!!! :-)
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Matt Ho > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 6:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] interceptors as components? > > > Currently, no. However, this is definitely a good > suggestion. Although > XW/WW supports IoC, it doesn't use it internally. I think > once we get > 2.0 squared away, we should definintely look at having XW/WW > using IoC > internally, which would include using it to create interceptors. > > M > > Anoop Ranganath wrote: > > Is it possible for an interceptor to be Aware? I'd like an > > interceptor > > to be handed a DAO. Ideally XWork would take care of it, > because the > > DAO has dependencies also. Is this possible? > > > > Anoop > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
