Yes the data gets sent from the result, though the interceptors wrap
this as well.
i.e the flow is
InterceptorA.before()
InterceptorB.before()
Action.execute()
Result.execute()
InterceptorB.after()
InterceptorA.after()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bernard Choi
> Sent: Saturday, 4 October 2003 3:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] No Cache result...
>
>
> From what I can understand (do correct me if I'm wrong) of
> the framework, the data starts to get sent to the client at
> the Result (in my case, VelocityResult). The interceptors
> wrap around the actions, which get executed before the
> result. Either way, the header is set before the response is
> committed, no ?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cameron Braid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 8:34 PM
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] No Cache result...
>
>
> > Headers need to be set before the response is committed.
> (ie started
> > to be sent to the client) since they get added to the start of the
> > http response, before the body.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf
> > > Of Bernard Choi
> > > Sent: Friday, 3 October 2003 9:25 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [OS-webwork] No Cache result...
> > >
> > >
> > > Greetings all,
> > >
> > > managed to get it work, but not sure why.
> > >
> > > The fix was as follows :
> > >
> > > public String intercept(ActionInvocation invocation)
> > > throws Exception {
> > > HttpServletResponse response = ServletActionContext.getResponse();
> > > response.addHeader("expires", "-1");
> > > response.addHeader("pragma", "no-cache");
> > > response.addHeader("cache-control", "no-store,
> > > no-cache, must-revalidate");
> > >
> > > String result = invocation.invoke();
> > >
> > > return result;
> > > }
> > >
> > > By setting the response BEFORE the invokation. No idea why though.
> > >
> > >
> > > >Greetings all,
> > > >
> > > >Just to check, is there something special about the way WW2
> > > handles the
> > > >httpResponses ?
> > > >
> > > >I have a need to disable the cacheing for a number of pages,
> > > and thus,
> > > >an interceptor was written to set the relevant headers in the
> > > >httpResponse.
> > > >
> > > > public String intercept(ActionInvocation invocation)
> > > throws Exception {
> > > > String result = invocation.invoke();
> > > >
> > > > HttpServletResponse response =
> > > ServletActionContext.getResponse();
> > > > response.addHeader("expires", "-1");
> response.addHeader("pragma",
> > > > "no-cache"); response.addHeader("cache-control", "no-store,
> > > no-cache,
> > > >must-revalidate");
> > > >
> > > > return result;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >I see that the response is indeed being set, but by the time
> > > it reaches
> > > the
> > > >browser, the results are still being cached.
> > > >
> > > >Just to check , is this the proper way to handle the response ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-------------------------------------------------------
> > > >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > >Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > >http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > >Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
