Is anyone using that issue tracker? I would hope not... I'll change it to just send to the CVS list
> -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] [JIRA-OS] Created: (WW-336) > Iterator tags value attribute required > > > For me, I like keeping this list for purely communication only. Four > reasons: > > 1) I check the CVS list for automated stuff and this list for > discussions. > Having stuff sent here blurs that line > 2) People sometimes reply to the creation emails, but that > discussion is > never logged in to JIRA -- then I feel obligated to keep > track of this > communication. > 3) I rarely check the CVS list because I don't have time to > dig through all > these things -- likewise I barely have time to keep up with > this list as is. > I'd rather not have even more to digest. > 4) A subject of "[OS-webwork][JIRA-OS] Created: (WW-336) ..." > is WAY too > long. I need to be able to see what the thread is about > without having to > look over 50+ characters. In the end I just ignore these emails. > > Why not use the CVS list, or even the "issues" list on > java.net? That might > be better, since if anyone uses the java.net issue tracker > emails are sent > there as well. > > -Pat > > >From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] [JIRA-OS] Created: (WW-336) Iterator tags > >value > >attribute required > >Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:20:22 -0500 > > > >I reset it back to the Xwork/WebWork notification scheme (it > had been > >turned off altogether)... I think it's valuable for new > issues to come > >here, so everyone can see what the issues are and might see that > >they're not the only one seeing this... Only issue creation > comes here > >now, more notifications go to the cvs list on dev.java.net. > > > >If others disagree, we can remove this list from all notifications. > > > >Jason > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:38 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [JIRA-OS] Created: (WW-336) > Iterator tags > > > value attribute required > > > > > > > > > ARGH! > > > > > > We've been over this before. Please do NOT have every new > issue sent > > > here, this is supposed to go to a separate cvs list for those who > > > care. > > > > > > On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 05:29 AM, > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Message: > > > > > > > > A new issue has been created in JIRA. > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - > > > > View the issue: > > > > > > > > http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-336 > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is an overview of the issue: > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - > > > > Key: WW-336 > > > > Summary: Iterator tags value attribute required > > > > Type: Bug > > > > > > > > Status: Unassigned > > > > Priority: Critical > > > > > > > > Project: WebWork > > > > Versions: > > > > 2.0-beta2 > > > > > > > > Assignee: > > > > Reporter: John Patterson > > > > > > > > Created: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 4:29 AM > > > > Updated: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 4:29 AM > > > > > > > > Description: > > > > The 'value' attribute of the IteratorTag should be optional > > > > allowing it to default to the object at the top of the stack. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - > > > > JIRA INFORMATION: > > > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > > > > > > > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the > > > administrators: > > > > http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/Administrators.jspa > > > > > > > > If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to > report see: > > > > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webw ork > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >Welcome to geek heaven. >http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ >Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork _________________________________________________________________ High-speed Internet access as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). Click here. https://broadband.msn.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
