Is there support for providing a resource key instead of a
text label, so that the label comes from a getText() call? If I'm understanding
your proposed change correctly, you could just say
<ww:textfield label="getText(name.middle)"
name="name.middle"/>
Or does that work? Will "name.middle" in the
getText() call get picked up as a string?
If this doesn't work, is there another way to do localized
labels? This seems like something that should be part of the tag, perhaps using
some sort of "resourceKey" attribute. I know that Struts supports this feature,
but I can't tell if ww does or not. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Lightbody Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 8:48 AM To: WebWork Subject: [OS-webwork] Compatibility for Tag Attributes I just noticed (actually, I’ve known it for a while, but now I need to do something about it) that the UI tags all take plain strings for their labels and a few other attributes. In WebWork 1.3 all attributes were parsed through the ValueStack and so I’m going to switch this back to the original behavior. If there is a great outcry against it, I can offer a config switch that by default would be off and would go back to this behavior. But I’d rather not do that and just keep things compatible. Any large objections? Remember, compatibility may not be a big deal for some people, but for others it’s a deal breaker. Also, 1.3 compatibility was one of the primary goals set forward when creating 2.0.
Example of change:
<ww:textfield label="Middle Name" name="name.middle" /> vs <ww:textfield label="’Middle Name’" name="name.middle" />
-Pat
|
- [OS-webwork] Compatibility for Tag Attributes Patrick Lightbody
- RE: [OS-webwork] Compatibility for Tag Attributes Drew McAuliffe
- RE: [OS-webwork] Compatibility for Tag Attrib... Patrick Lightbody
- Re: [OS-webwork] Compatibility for Tag Attributes Francisco Hernandez
- RE: [OS-webwork] Compatibility for Tag Attributes Jason Carreira