I'm curious... why are you writing your own ActionIvocation? I would have expected that Pico integration would be through an interceptor, much like XWork's own IoC support.
-Tim. Quoting christoph sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello people! > > I am in the process of submitting webwork2 support to > pico/nanocontainer, and i would need a little change to a xwork > class. > > I created a picoActionInvocation, and there I need access to the > request, and i get it through > req = (HttpServletRequest) > extraContext.get(WebWorkStatics.HTTP_REQUEST); > for this to work i had to change extraContext from package local to > protected. Can someone please make this change in webwork cvs, or is > there another way to get the Request when subclassing > DefaultActionInvocation? > > best regards > chris > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
