[1] will give you the stack starting back one... [1].that gives you the same as .. In ww1.x
> -----Original Message----- > From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 5:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] that keyword... > > > i always like using . in ww1, btw is there a way to get the parent > object like ww1's .. ? > > Patrick Lightbody wrote: > > > Since "that" hasn't gone in to a real release, I'm totally happy to > > change the name. Top or t will probably be what I go with. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of > > Robert Dawson > > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:50 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [OS-webwork] that keyword... > > > > I am sorry to bring up what must be a topic people are sick of by > > now.... but why "that" for the top of the value stack -- > > > > there are other words that would be better. "that" sounds > like a bad > > joke. > > > > how about "top" > > > > "stackTop" > > > > or something similar. (even better would be a 1 character keyword). > > > > I understand that this might break some code, but the > "that" keyword > > seems so wrong. The people I have talked to about it seem > to either > > think that > > the "that" keyword is either a bad joke or when talking > about someone is > > refering to something else. ie that is how you do it -- I have seen > > alot of > > "interesting" changes made between webwork 1 and 2 and > would find that > > the > > expression language change to OGNL one of the more frustrating. > > > > I can understand that the webwork 1 expression language > didn't always > > follow what Ruby people love to call the "principal of > least suprise", > > a good quality for any API, but as a general rule, it was good at > > working with a > > ValueStack. OGNL seems to be a good object navigation > language, but I > > don't > > think that the value stack interaction is right. Treating > the stack as > > an > > array in OGNL feels wrong to me. I know that the use of "." > for the top > > of > > the stack doesn't make sense with OGNL, but would love it > if one of the > > smart people out there could come up with something that did. > > > > I apolagise for the length of that and the ranty nature of > the e-mail. > > WebWork 1 is a great framework, WebWork2 adds some nice > features, and > > I want the best for it (honest :)). > > > > Rob > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 29/09/2003 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & > > Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The > > Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the > > Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & > > Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The > > Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the > > Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product > knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have > a chance to win $100 > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?> HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > > > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
