James Cook wrote:
I thought of a pointless insult. ;-)
We used this pattern in a large application and it worked well. BTW, for
Hani's edification
(http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/20031029#opensymphony_dirty_laundry),
this is not a toy application, but rather a large app that manages
billions of dollars per year for a State entity.
Hey don't shoot the messenger! For another thing, I know that ww1.3 is
deployed in many places, a lot of which are far from toy apps.
I don't have an opinion as to whether it should be added to
ActionSupport, but I'm curious as to where people think the line should
be drawn. Why should this be added to ActionSupport as opposed to your
own subclass? (We all have subclassed ActionSupport or rolled our own,
haven't we?)
Right, so this highlights another issue, that for people who need this
sort of functionality, they can just put it in their subclass. Adding it
to the base class would hurt everyone who already does it in the subclass.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
