Getting a bit tired Jason? Hard work
answering all these questions!
I was actually asking about the result code
returned from the ActionInvocation.invoke() method not the Action.invoke()
method. The later is used to fetch a Result from the action config to
execute after the action finishes BUT the former return value is never
used.
Also, my logic stated that if the result HAS been
executed then we can assume that the result HAS been executed (so don't execute
another). If the Action and Result both complete execution then the
property is set to true and any exceptions thrown after this point must be
thrown from Interceptors. Correct?
I have implemented this interceptor and it seems to
work fine (uses 1.4 logging however). Although it has hardly been put
through its paces. I think it would make a useful addition to
XWork.
John.
|
Title: Message
- [OS-webwork] ActionInvocation result John Patterson
- RE: [OS-webwork] ActionInvocation result Jason Carreira
- Re: [OS-webwork] ActionInvocation result John Patterson
- Re: [OS-webwork] ActionInvocation result Tim Dwelle
- [OS-webwork] ValueStack being unexpectedly rep... Frederick N. Brier
- Re: [OS-webwork] ValueStack being unexpect... Frederick N. Brier
- RE: [OS-webwork] ValueStack being unex... Patrick Lightbody
- RE: [OS-webwork] ActionInvocation result Jason Carreira
- Re: [OS-webwork] ActionInvocation result John Patterson