--- Drew McAuliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My biggest problem with this is that it basically
> eliminates any advantage
> to using velocity as far as ease of use is
> concerned. One of the main
> reasons I prefer velocity over JSP is that the
> syntax is more natural,
> especially for things like iterations. Requiring two
> extra lines makes the
> whole thing ugly, unintuitive, and increases the
> possibility of errors (what
> if you forget to pop the item off of the stack? The
> possibility of subtle,
> hard to find errors over a large code base is
> definitely there). Also, the
> value stack should be used when it is necessary to
> be used. Passing a
> variable to a tag via a velocity directive doesn't
> seem to me like it needs
> to get the stack involved. You have a velocity
> approach the moment you start
> to use velocity as your templating language. The
> stack is a utility object
> that is available to your pages, and is obviously a
> core part of the
> framework, but if it doesn't need to get involved,
> it shouldn't. 

IMHO, block directives shall have own subcontext, and
clean stack after they are done anyway....

At least I design my directives this way. 

regards,

=====
----[ Konstantin Pribluda ( ko5tik ) ]----------------
Zu Verstärkung meines Teams suche ich ab Sofort einen
Softwareentwickler[In] für die Festanstellung. 
Arbeitsort: Mainz 
Skills:  Programieren, Kentnisse in OpenSource-Bereich
----[ http://www.pribluda.de ]------------------------

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to