Yes, and they can inherit from the base ActionName-validation.xml, so you can have that, plus ActionName-validationContext1-validation.xml & ActionName-validationContext2-validation.xml
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XDoclet and XWork validators > > > So you mean you have different .xml files used in each context? > > On Dec 1, 2003, at 10:22 AM, Jason Carreira wrote: > > > What Hani is saying is that the purpose of external validation > > metadata in the form of XML files is to separate the validations > > applied from the code itself... Combining the two into one > source file > > reduces the advantages of this. > > > > I have several cases where we use different validations, > but it's down > > in model classes. We have different validations for data entry vs. > > batch loading, for instance. > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:10 AM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XDoclet and XWork validators > >> > >> > >> Validators are tied to their action when defined in > >> ActionName-Validation.xml files right? > >> > >> So, why not generate these files from javadoc comments in the code? > >> > >> I'm only familiar with them as they are defined/explained > in the JOSP > >> book. > >> > >> If I'm not mistake XDoclet already supports struts > validators which I > >> assume work the same way as webwork? > >> > >> I haven't see any cases were you'd define multiple > validators for the > >> same property of the same action and use each in a > different context. > >> > >> On Nov 30, 2003, at 6:46 PM, Hani Suleiman wrote: > >> > >>> I'm missing something here.... > >>> > >>> so you want external validators, specified in an external xml > >>> configuration file...and you want to generate this file by adding > >>> javadoc comments to the source file that needs the > validation, thus > >>> putting in validation code right alongside the code that > needs it, > >>> without the benefits of type safety and suchlike? > >>> > >>> On Nov 30, 2003, at 7:41 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote: > >>> > >>>> Can XDoclet currently generate these from javadoc > comments in your > >>>> action? > >>>> > >>>> I don't see any references to doing this in the JOSP book. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > >>>> SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help > >> you create > >>>> better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: > >>>> http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------- > >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > >>> SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help > >> you create > >>> better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: > >>> http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > >> SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help > you create > >> better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: > >> http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help > you create > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us > help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
