Oops, my bad. I thought you meant two *different* Action classes with the same action name in different namespaces...
Do you really think this is an issue? If you don't want the same validation for the 2 in different namespaces, then name them differently. On the other hand, if you wanted to have an Action inherited by subpackages and have the same validations, then adding the namespace to the filename would mean you'd have to copy them. Open an issue for being able to specify the context value to be used (defaulting to the Action name if none is set) in the interceptor ref... Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Dwelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 1:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [XWork] Howto use validation > framework with plain JavaBeans (no Actions) > > > Jason, > > Either you misunderstood me... or I'm being incredibly thick > (I'm leaning towards the latter)... > > But if 2 actions are > > 1) of the same class > 2) and have the same action name > 3) but reside in 2 different namespaces > > then they'd *have to* have the same validation. > > I don't see why you say they wouldn't. The classnames would > be identical, naturally... and the validationContext would be > identical too, since validationContext = action name. > > Now, admittedly... this may be an uncommon enough occurance > for it not to be a concern. Heck, it may even be a desirable > side effect. > > But as I understood it, one of the big advantages to > externalizing our validation rules was the ability for the > same action class to have different 'context-appropriate' validations. > > And in such a scenario, it seems perfectly reasonable that > you would distinguish two such actions solely by namespace. > > -Tim. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 11:25 PM > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] [XWork] Howto use validation > framework with plain JavaBeans (no Actions) > > > > No, because the validation files are named > > > > ClassName-validationContext-validation.xml > > > > Therefore the context is just a further specifier on top of > the class > > name. All of the validations are class specific, with class > defaults > > in > > > > ClassName-validation.xml > > > > And have more specific validations which are added to these > defaults > > in the context specific files. You can also make the validation > > context for visitor validations be different from the > context passed > > in from the outer Action by specifying a context param. I should > > probably make it where you can specify the context in the > interceptor > > reference too... Hmm... Well, I've got to have something to add for > > 1.1 :-) > > > > Jason > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tim Dwelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:54 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [XWork] Howto use validation framework > > > with plain JavaBeans (no Actions) > > > > > > > > > In the code snippet below, the context string = the action name. > > > > > > Doesn't that mean that if 2 actions (of the same class) have the > > > same name, but live in different namespaces, that they > have to use > > > the same validation? > > > > > > Wouldn't it be better if the context string contained the > namespace > > > as well? > > > > > > > > > -Tim. > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 4:45 PM > > > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] [XWork] Howto use validation > > > framework with plain JavaBeans (no Actions) > > > > > > > > > > Yep... > > > > > > > > Here's the before() method from the ValidationInterceptor: > > > > > > > > protected void before(ActionInvocation invocation) throws > > > > Exception { > > > > Action action = invocation.getAction(); > > > > String context = invocation.getProxy().getActionName(); > > > > > > > > if (log.isDebugEnabled()) { > > > > log.debug("Validating " + > > > > invocation.getProxy().getNamespace() + > > > > invocation.getProxy().getActionName() + "."); > > > > } > > > > > > > > ActionValidatorManager.validate(action, context); > > > > } > > > > > > > > There's nothing special about the action or the context > here... It > > > > could be any bean and String context name. > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Torsten Juergeleit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 4:38 PM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: [OS-webwork] [XWork] Howto use validation framework > > > > > with plain JavaBeans (no Actions) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is XWork's validation framework usable with > > > > > non-actions (e.g. POJOs or JavaBeans) too? > > > > > > > > > > If yes, where can I find sample code? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Torsten > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback > Program. Does > > > > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you > > > > > create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! > > > > > Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwor > > > > > k > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback > Program. Does > > > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you > > > > create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click > > > > Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/o> pensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you > > > create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click > > > Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does > > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help > you create > > better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: > > http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us > help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
